Left on Red holds itself to the following standards. These are not aspirational — they are the criteria by which we evaluate every piece before publication.
Every factual claim in our reporting must be verifiable. We cite primary sources — court decisions, legislative text, government data, and peer-reviewed research — wherever they exist. We do not rely solely on secondary reporting. If we cannot verify a claim, we say so.
We present the strongest available version of every argument, including arguments we ultimately disagree with. We do not strawman opposing positions. If the evidence on a question is genuinely mixed, we say so.
Errors will be corrected promptly and transparently. Corrections are noted at the top of the affected article, not appended quietly at the bottom. We do not delete errors without noting that a correction has been made.
Left on Red accepts no advertising, no political funding, and no sponsored content. Funding sources are disclosed in our annual transparency report. Editorial decisions are made without input from funders.
We distinguish clearly between factual reporting and editorial analysis. Opinion and commentary are labeled as such. Our news coverage does not editorialize; our analysis pieces present reasoning transparently so readers can evaluate it.